Skip to Main Content

Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

578 U.S. 330 (2016) — Supreme Court of the United States (2016)

30+ Years Experience Nationwide Service Fast Response Confidential
Supreme Court of the United States
2016
578 U.S. 330 (2016)

Facts of the Case

Thomas Robins sued Spokeo under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), alleging Spokeo published inaccurate personal information about him. Spokeo argued Robins lacked Article III standing because he only alleged a statutory violation without 'concrete injury.' The Ninth Circuit held the statutory violation alone was sufficient for standing.

Legal Issue

Does a plaintiff have Article III standing to sue for a statutory violation without alleging concrete harm beyond the bare statutory violation? Or must the plaintiff show actual, tangible injury?

Court Holding

The Supreme Court held (6-2) that a plaintiff must allege BOTH a particularized injury AND a concrete injury to have Article III standing. A bare statutory violation, without concrete harm, is insufficient. However, a statutory violation can be 'concrete' if Congress enacted the statute to protect against intangible harms traditionally recognized — but the plaintiff must still allege the violation caused actual harm or a material risk of harm.

Why This Case Matters

Spokeo has major implications for federal statutory claims in foreclosure — FDCPA, FCRA, RESPA, TILA. After Spokeo, a homeowner cannot merely allege 'the servicer violated RESPA' and claim standing. The homeowner must allege CONCRETE INJURY: financial harm, emotional distress, reputational damage, or material risk of harm. A technical violation (servicer responded 31 days instead of 30, with no actual harm) may not confer standing. Federal courts routinely dismiss statutory claims without concrete injury after Spokeo.

Impact on Homeowners

When pleading federal statutory claims, always allege SPECIFIC concrete injury: 'The servicer's failure to respond to my NOE caused me to lose my refinance opportunity, costing me $450/month in additional interest' (financial harm), 'The debt collector's threatening calls caused severe anxiety requiring medical treatment' (emotional distress). Do NOT rely on 'the defendant violated the statute, therefore I have standing.' Spokeo requires more.

Related Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

What counts as 'concrete injury' after Spokeo?
Concrete injury includes: (1) FINANCIAL HARM — lost money, additional costs, higher interest, (2) EMOTIONAL DISTRESS — severe anxiety, depression, sleeplessness (must be significant), (3) REPUTATIONAL HARM — inaccurate credit reporting affecting credit score, (4) MATERIAL RISK OF HARM — the violation created a real risk of future harm. A bare statutory violation without real impact is insufficient.
Free · Confidential · No Obligation

Ready to Protect Your Home?

Every day matters when facing foreclosure. Get your free, confidential consultation and learn your options — no obligation.

Available Monday–Friday · 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM Pacific

Free · Confidential · No Obligation

Get Your Free Full Case Review

Tell us about your situation — our senior legal team will review every detail and contact you within 24 hours with a tailored plan. No obligation. 100% confidential.

1

Submit Your Information

Tell us about your situation in complete confidence.

2

Case Analysis

Our legal team reviews your documents and foreclosure status.

3

Receive Your Strategy

We outline your best options and recommended path forward.

4

We Get to Work

Your dedicated team begins protecting your home and rights.

Call or Text Us

Monday–Friday · 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM Pacific

Contact Information
Property Information
Loan Details
Financial Situation
Your Situation

Your information is 100% confidential. We never share your details.

Call/Text NowFree Consultation